Ashes - England v Australia - 2009

Talking to my English colleagues thought me, that the English probably will go for a draw. But that means, that Australia will keep the Ashes because they won it last year?

Btw. I had my first "cricket rules" and "how to watch and enjoy cricket" lesson last week. The concept of being a spectator at a cricket game and shout and drink for 4 to 5 days sounds very interesting to me ;)
 
Btw. I had my first "cricket rules" and "how to watch and enjoy cricket" lesson last week. The concept of being a spectator at a cricket game and shout and drink for 4 to 5 days sounds very interesting to me ;)
__________________

There is little drinking involved in cricket, it seems to have been imported by the Australians. Probably worried they are going to loose....

;)

N.
 
There is little drinking involved in cricket, it seems to have been imported by the Australians. Probably worried they are going to loose....
It is no surprise really. Given the choice of drinking hot tea or cold beer for 5 days under the hot Australian sun, what would you do? :P

Anyway, it looks like WWOS Crystal Ball has had a hernia - it is predicting 88% of an English win :huh:. It looks like the weather is going to clear up so we still have a chance of a win here.

Meanwhile, over in Germany, Webber is continuing to prove Australia's sporting awesomeness...
 
Yes, looks like a win for Australia. Didn't expect England to collapse till the second test. Hamiltons slumped back down the grid, looks like it'll be Brawn again.

Looks like another boring Sunday, back down the pub I think...

N.

---------- Post added at 11:19 ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 ----------

Thats Pieterson gone, I'll be going soon...
34 for 3.

N.
 
Whoops, there goes another, 4/46
 
There goes another one...70 for 5. Maybe Flintoff will get somewhere.
N.
 
Sort of, Flintoff falls

That was a good minute for Australia
 
Marvellous, now a pitch invasion...

Maybe the F1 is better, oh no its not.

N.

---------- Post added at 18:46 ---------- Previous post was at 14:43 ----------

A great escape...


England drew with Australia
England: 435 & 252-9 (105.0 overs
Australia: 674-6 (181.0 overs)

ahem.

N.
 
It may have been a draw but I dare say Australia takes the psychological points to Lords. Tally-ho, chaps!
 
AUSSIE! AUSSIE! AUSSIE! OI! OI! OI!

sorry, couldn't resist
 
Ponting has been spitting his dummy again (no surprises there). For what its worth, I don't think he can afford to complain much, they got 95 overs in on day 5.

It seems that Flintoff will not play at Lords and be replaced by Harmison - that should not disadvantage England too much, if at all. Notwithstanding, it looks like England have been rain dancing again. Rain predicted for days 2,3 and 5 at Lords. I know that forecast is still a few days out, and English weather changes faster than David Beckham's hairstyles, but its still looking grim for getting five full days of play.
 
Second Ashes Test, Lord's, day one:
England win the toss, and bat.

Those teams in full:
England: AJ Strauss (captain), AN Cook, RS Bopara, KP Pietersen, PD Collingwood, MJ Prior (wkt), A Flintoff, SCJ Broad, GP Swann, JM Anderson, G Onions.


Australia: RT Ponting (captain), PJ Hughes, SM Katich, MJ Clarke, MEK Hussey, MJ North, BJ Haddin (wkt), MG Johnson, PM Siddle, NM Hauritz, BW Hilfenhaus.


---------- Post added at 14:44 ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 ----------

Drinks break, 187 for 0...

N.
 
First half of the day: 187/0 - well done Strauss & Cook.
Second half of the day: 177/6 - well done Hilfenhaus & Siddle
Overall: 364/6 - slightly in England's favour, so Australia will need to get a good first session in. This match is looking quite interesting already.
 
Usual England play, do quite well at first, then get careless. Strausss must be pulling his hair out. Especially as Flintoff went for 4...

N.
 
Engand has been bowled out for 425, the Australians are batting, even her Majesty is there.
Also Peter Siddle isnt to well, he looked like he was going to throw up during his over.
 
Last edited:
Wonder why Strauss didn't do a follow on?

N.
 
Wonder why Strauss didn't do a follow on?
To give his bowlers a break. It is a pretty common strategy in modern test cricket, especially when you have as much time to win as he does. Alastair Cook doesn't seem to realise there is no rush - 30 off 31 balls!
 
Back
Top