STS-119

Launch postponed until NET:

EDT: Sun 15 Mar @ 7.43pm
GMT/UTC: Sun 15 Mar @ 11.43pm

However, there is also a very strong possibility that the launch will be pushed back into Mon 16, meaning that a shortened mission will have to be flown, including just 1 EVA. This is because the shuttle needs to leave the ISS before the new Soyuz TMA-14 launches on Mar 25.

Also, the launch of the Atlas 5 rocket may now have to be posponed aswell due to STS-119

More info: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2009...king-following-engineering-overview-for-crew/
 
Goddamnit. that ship is really a piece of junk. everytime they luch that thing. something breaks.
 
Goddamnit. that ship is really a piece of junk. everytime they luch that thing. something breaks.

Don't diss the shuttles, man! :P

Anyway it was the ET not the Orbiter itself.
 
Goddamnit. that ship is really a piece of junk. everytime they luch that thing. something breaks.
Discovery is fine, so is the SRBs and ET. Problem is on the ground side! Right now they're in the process of inerting the ET and that is a 20 hour process. So by tommorow afternoon they'll have access to the GUCP, and the troubleshooting can begin. Whatever the problem is, they'll have it fixed in time for a Sunday launch.

So blame the pad for this delay, not the vehicle.

---------- Post added at 12:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:53 AM ----------

Don't diss the shuttles, man! :P

Anyway it was the ET not the Orbiter itself.
Wrong! Problem is not on the flight-element side. It is on the ground side.
 
So blame the pad for this delay, not the vehicle.

Hmmm...

jgrillo2002 said:
Goddamnit. that ship is really a piece of junk. everytime they luch that thing. something breaks.

Yes. I bet if they launched the pad, there would in fact be quite a lot of broken stuff.
 
Goddamnit. that ship is really a piece of junk. everytime they luch that thing. something breaks.

2008 went 4 missions without being scrubbed once.
2007 went 3.
So far, 7 missions have flown right on time (STS-122 included, because even though it scrubbed in 2007, flew first attempt 2008)
 
As an astronaut I would rather try to ride on Soyuz than on the Shuttle, if my goal would be to reach orbit as scheduled.

Honestly, a lot of people criticise Ares (basically for the sake to see the Shuttle flying longer, to keep jobs and because it is not their science fiction they call "cutting edge") but they do not admit that the Shuttle is not in a better condition, only because it is in operation. STS is a real expensive and flawed pain. 8 missions left until 2010 + the Hubble mission. I doubt the ISS will be "finished" (it will not be what it was intended to be anyway). NASA should stop the Shuttle flights as soon as possible, to fullly concentrate on going back to capsule design. The manned part of NASA is in a mess, including STS-400, the OBSS and pitch maneuver to watch the major design flaw the STS has to deal with, beside all those smaller issues, delaying missions for weeks, month and years, including development of new stuff sadly...
 
Managers Move Ahead with Sunday Launch Plans

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:02:05 PM GMT+0100

Today's scheduled 4 p.m. EDT status meeting to discuss yesterday's scrub of space shuttle Discovery was cancelled. Based on all of the work done during the last 24 hours, teams believe they have sufficient understanding of the hydrogen leak to press for a Sunday launch at 7:43 p.m. A Launch Day minus one (L-1) Mission Management Team meeting has been scheduled for Saturday at 1 p.m.
 
--UPDATE--

The hydrogen vent line is currently being re-attached to the ET. The hydrogen leak problem seems to have been caused by the GUCP not being properly aligned with the ET. The left and right pivot seat was not fully connecting to the external tank's pin receptacle sleeve at the bottom of the GUCP. Crews are now in the process of checking alignments and making adjustments to get a proper fit. Leak checks will be performed following the adjustments.

In simplified terms: The problem may not be with the connection between the hydrogen vent line and the GUCP as originally thought, instead, problem looks like it is with the connection between the GUCP & the ET.


A pre-launch news conference will be live on NASA TV @ 6.30pm GMT Saturday.


So far, STS-119 is looking good for a launch attempt tomorrow:)

---------- Post added at 18:57 ---------- Previous post was at 18:19 ----------

Prelaunch news conference now saying that the GUCP misalignment with the ET is NOT related to hydrogen leak, so quick disconnect may indeed still be the cause of the hydrogen leak.

---------- Post added at 19:24 ---------- Previous post was at 18:57 ----------

Prelaunch news conference now concluded. They said that no "smoking gun" was found, meaning that the root cause of the hydrogen leak has not yet been identified. So far, all hardware that could have been responsible for the leak has been replaced, even though no fault was found with the original hardware. It is hoped this will have fixed the leak, wherever or whatever it was.

The leak is considered a ground-based problem, so an understanding of the cause of the problem is not required for STS-119 to fly. As long as no hydrogen leaks during ET fuelling tomorrow, STS-119 can fly. A cause can be figured out at the pad once STS-119 has launched.

Also, in rubber seal is apparently misaligned inside the ET near the GUCP.

---------- Post added at 13:08 ---------- Previous post was Yesterday at 19:24 ----------

Some useful sites for STS-119 launch:

www.nasa.gov/ntv - NASA TV

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts119/status.html - spaceflightnow.com's live updates + live webcast of STS-119 launch with ISS Ex.10 commander Leroy Chiao

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/launch/launch_blog.html - NASA's STS-119 launch blog

----------
Other:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/launch/countdown101.html - explains a bit about the countdown process

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/mission_schedule.html - STS-119 NASA TV schedule for whole of mission


----------
TO MODS: Would it be possible to have the STS-126 thread removed from the space flight news sticky list, and have the STS-119 thread made a sticky instead? Thanks.
 
T-6 hours and counting. Tanking coverage has started on NASA TV.

---------- Post added at 02:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:19 PM ----------

Go for tanking, LH2 chilldown underway.

---------- Post added at 02:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:22 PM ----------

LH2 now in slowfill.

---------- Post added at 02:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:32 PM ----------

LOX chilldown underway.

---------- Post added at 03:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:35 PM ----------

LOX now in slowfill.

---------- Post added at 03:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:04 PM ----------

LOX and LH2 now both in fastfill.
 
As an astronaut I would rather try to ride on Soyuz than on the Shuttle, if my goal would be to reach orbit as scheduled.

Honestly, a lot of people criticise Ares (basically for the sake to see the Shuttle flying longer, to keep jobs and because it is not their science fiction they call "cutting edge") but they do not admit that the Shuttle is not in a better condition, only because it is in operation. STS is a real expensive and flawed pain. 8 missions left until 2010 + the Hubble mission. I doubt the ISS will be "finished" (it will not be what it was intended to be anyway). NASA should stop the Shuttle flights as soon as possible, to fullly concentrate on going back to capsule design. The manned part of NASA is in a mess, including STS-400, the OBSS and pitch maneuver to watch the major design flaw the STS has to deal with, beside all those smaller issues, delaying missions for weeks, month and years, including development of new stuff sadly...
I have to disagree on this.There is nothing wrong with the shuttle design.We need reusable design and so far shuttle proved to be great achievement in that.
 
I have to disagree on this.There is nothing wrong with the shuttle design.We need reusable design and so far shuttle proved to be great achievement in that.
The two shuttle disasters were due to the design, whether or not you consider it a major design flaw or not.

With standard rocket design of the payload (orbiter) on top of the stack, rather than on the side, the Booster failure of challenger wouldn't have ruptured the ET, and the falling foam on Columbia wouldn't have damaged the TPS on the wing.
 
The two shuttle disasters were due to the design, whether or not you consider it a major design flaw or not.

With standard rocket design of the payload (orbiter) on top of the stack, rather than on the side, the Booster failure of challenger wouldn't have ruptured the ET, and the falling foam on Columbia wouldn't have damaged the TPS on the wing.
Ok,the first disaster was due seal on SRB,the second due piece of foam on the ET.Nothing caused by the Shuttle itself.
 
No indication of leakage at this time.

---------- Post added at 04:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

LOX about 75% full, final inspection team standing by for briefing.

---------- Post added at 04:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:32 PM ----------

LOX now 85% full, LH2 above 98% and topping.
 
Back
Top