.... and in the water! And explosion!
Reusability was a question for the Falcon 9 until they were able to recover and inspect the stage. When they were able to do that, they were able to do iterative design modifications based on that understanding that now lets that rocket be reused dozens of times or more. They'll be able to do the same with the booster and Starship when they can get a look at the damage in person.As it looks like now, even if they may be able to recover both in the next few flights, it doesn't look like there will be reusability without major overhauls and repairs between flights
It's a pity that so many videographers don't bother to set the audio level correctly.RIP headphone users:
I am not sure you can in case of a rocket launch. Not unless you develop a microphone specifically for it (probably one that uses a square foot of leather as a membrane or something similarly silly...)It's a pity that so many videographers don't bother to set the audio level correctly.
Maybe they can build one which can weathervane, so it will always be shielded by the tower when it comes down. Not sure how much explosive power it still has, but even the flames touching the tower looked like it could have done some damageThe required precision for that catch is insane. What the hell are they going to do if they encounter an unexpected wind gust?? Build a new tower?![]()
Schoeps writes, their general use microphones can record a sound level of 130 dB with 0.5% THD. And special microphones designed for close distance recording of drums and human voice withstand > 140 dB.I am not sure you can in case of a rocket launch. Not unless you develop a microphone specifically for it (probably one that uses a square foot of leather as a membrane or something similarly silly...)