- Joined
- May 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,580
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
It's a question of interests. But you may be right that people like me would not be very useful for something like the Space Transportation System. I think a little bit the way like Wernher von Braun and others of that era, who did what I also would have done as a NASA person in 1972 (to resign), when it came out that Apollo is over and a potential mission to Mars (the Moon was just the first step) had been settled because of budget cuts. What we did after Skylab until today might be technological achievements, but by far do not even reach our level of capabilities.
I agree. The problem is that it's hard to get public money for the space program. During the initial Space Race it was relatively easy to get all the money they needed, since there was the perceived threat of the Soviets and what could happen if they conquered the moon before us.
However, these days, most politicians proposing more funding for NASA don't get very far. The average American doesn't care about space any more than they care about the lost shoe they just ran over on the highway. They don't see any direct, immediate benefit to them, so they're not willing to fund it--nevermind that a lot of things that people use in their everday lives have come from the space program.
The average american would rather have another $200 (or however much the tax breaks/refunds amounted to) in their pocket each year than a base on another celestial body.
Imagine what the space program could have done with the $700 billion that got given to the financial institutions. I'm pretty sure that that's higher than the total amount that NASA's had to work with in its entire 50-year history.