Search results

It must be a very light celestial body if you want to land on it with a space shuttle if it has no atmothphere... :lol:

It's not for accent but for lunar decent (Orbit to landing): https://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=38581&highlight=baseland But should work also for other bodies without an atomothphere...

I like the feeling of flying and hovering the Harrier because it's the most similar feeling in DCS to fly the DG in Orbiter :lol:.

Sorry if this is a bit off topic, but did someone else remember EF2000? It was a briliant combat flight simulator for MS DOS with "VR Support" ;-) (I never tested the VR functionality ;-)) and a cool dynamic campain. I guess it was before Falcon 4.0 in 1995! Just because the did series was...

Today I've seen this very good summary of DCS. I hope that the guys from ED will watch this ;-): DCS: A Beautiful Mess. Its History, the good, the bad, and the ugly. - YouTube

There are some new intersting reports: English: German (Not exact similar):

I will wait to buy the F-16 till they have finished it, maybe in the first discount offer, because of my expirences with the hornet. I love flying the hornet and it's still a great module, but I never thought that it will takes so long to complete this module (more than a year now?), so I...

Yes of course we have :thumbup:

That were also my thoughts. So if R=0, then U=R*I=0, but I=U/R, so it's a division by zero, thats not allowed, even 0/0 is not allowed! This is why I got confused assuming that these are superconductors. And this brought me to this Topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_equations, I don't...

by solving this system I get: I1= -I4 + 15 I2= -I4 + 7 I3= -I4 + 6 I4= I4 but the question is waht's the value of I4? And can we assume that I1 = -I3 and I4 = I2 if all conductors have no resistance ?

Hello, is it possible to calculate I1, I2, I3 and I4 assumed that the resistance of the wires is negligible small (let's say they are superconductors :lol:)? Let's say voltage is 12V if required. Sorry but I don't get it at the moment...

When I was a child (I'm was born in 81), I remember that my teacher was saying us that it is unknown if other stars have planets and that we will never be able to proof such planets... And today, we are able to proof water in an atmothphere of a world which is 110 light years away from us. I...

http://astrobiology.com/2019/09/water-vapor-on-the-habitable-zone-exoplanet-k2-18b.html https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.04642 I gues this is the first time we found water on an exoplanet?

Never noticed that they could launch the F104 in such a way... But it looks a bit dangerous.

What's inside of the Lunar Module? - YouTube

For planets without atmothphere you can also try out Baseland. You can download it here in the first post: https://www.orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=38581&highlight=baseland

From wikipedia: thats all at the moment...

Hello, I've read an article that Microsoft will release a new version of Microsoft Flight Simulator in 2020? I have no Idea if it can keep up with the old version in terms of realism etc., I just have read this short articles and this trailer... The graphics looks great!